kiranlightpaw: kiran_likeshine (Default)
When I first heard that Disney was going to re-release Lion King in 3D, I was a little concerned. This is one of my favorite movies and was a huge part of my childhood / adolescence, and I wasn't a big fan of the idea of it being butchered. But all the same, how could I turn down the chance to see one of my all-time favorite films in the theater again for the first time since I originally saw it in 1994, especially seeing as how I missed the IMAX release a few years back?

I'm not going to review the content of the movie. If you haven't seen it already, there's something really wrong with you. It was one of the biggest films of the 1990s.

As for the 3D version, well, I can now assure you that none of the magic was lost. This was an extremely well-done version of the film that kept everything intact while tastefully adding depth with the 3D. It was just as good as I remembered it being. Right at the beginning, during the Circle of Life scene, at one point in the film Zazu comes flying into the picture. In the 3D version, he literally seems to go flying right over your head. This earned several "oohs" from the crowd. There were only a few moments where the 3D seemed gimmicky.

In short, I was literally smiling the entire movie. It was so good. And yes, I cried when Mufasa died. If it's wrong to cry then, then I don't want to be right.

The only possibly complaint I could have about the 3D was that, in a few scenes - it was most notable in the fight scenes - the low frame rate became very noticeable. But it only lasted a couple of seconds at a time.

I know a lot of people are probably like, "why bother when you can watch it on DVD?" These are probably the same people who say "eh, I'll catch it on DVD later" for every new film that comes out. There's just something to be said for actually going to the cinema to see a movie. The whole exercise of getting a ticket, sitting in the theater and being around other people just can't be reproduced in the theater.

In this case, the crowd was half the fun! I knew this was going to be a special movie when, after the opening scenes (the Circle of Life) and the big Lion King logo shows, the crowd was already clapping and cheering. Someone in the back yelled "boo!" when Scar's paw slammed down on top of the mouse. The crowd again clapped and cheered after Rafiki convinced Simba to go back, and the film got a standing ovation at the end. I love it when that happens. That totally made the evening for me.

But I also realized what was happening when I looked around the theater. We went to the 9:20 showing at the Monaco, so there were only a few kids in the theater. Most of the people in the theater were 20 and 30-somethings like me as Sarah. People who remember seeing it as kids now getting the opportunity to see it again. For those people, it was (like me) a chance to "be a kid again." And there were some people who probably saw it in the theater as kids were now sharing that same experience with their kids. I know that had to be special.

So yeah. It was very well done. I may try to catch it again one more time before it goes out of theaters again in 2 weeks.
kiranlightpaw: kiran_likeshine (Default)

Went and saw Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'hoole last night. Highly recommended - probably one of the best films I've seen all year. Think Lord of the Rings, but with owls. I also had no clue it was based on books - my reading list just got a little longer.

I also loved how they cast Sam Neill and Hugo Weaving, especially having Weaving in another Village Roadshow picture. I thought they both did a great job voice acting. And, music by Owl City? Perfect!


Jul. 23rd, 2010 11:35 pm
kiranlightpaw: kiran_likeshine (Default)
Went and saw Inception with some of my coworkers tonight. It was enjoyable! Probably one of the most cerebral films I've seen in years - probably since the Matrix came out in 1999 and blew the fucking mind of a 17 year old computer junkie. I may actually need to go see it again to be sure I caught everything.

Potential Spoilers )

So yeah. If you like Science Fiction movies that fuck with your brain, take a little time to go see Inception.


Jan. 24th, 2010 10:24 pm
kiranlightpaw: kiran_likeshine (Default)
Had a good and productive weekend.
  • Got the hydrangea trimmed back, and the property line cleared. The chainsaw made short work of both of those. Also got the front bed and mailbox bed weeded. All I still have left to do is chop the stuff I cleared up from the property line into firewood.

  • Went out to try the new barbecue place at Bridge Street - Smoke House. Sarah and I both really enjoyed it. The barbecue quality was as good as Greenbriar, and the atmosphere was actually good and not geriatric!

  • Made good progress on my goal of ripping all my DVDs onto the file server. With the AppleTVs in the living room and bedroom, it's like having our own private VOD system. Unfortunately, I'm still only on "A". :P

  • Got a bootleg of my new favorite movie on my iPhone.

  • Relaxed.

  • And finally, caught up with [ profile] kubulai after 4.75 years. It as a good conversation - one I look forward to continuing soon. The only downside was it was nearly 2am before I finally got off the computer and even later before I got to sleep. Too much stuff going through my head.
kiranlightpaw: (avatar)
I told you I would be a lying sack of shit if I said I wasn't going to write about Avatar again. This entry, however, is only tangentially related.

Long before that movie, I was a big fan of the idea of interstellar travel - the idea of travel between the stars. Not so much in the Star Trek sense of warp speed leaps in hours between stars, but in a realistic, scientifically accurate understanding of what it would take to get to another star. It's something I've been following since about the age of ... probably thirteen or so, and has waxed and waned over the course of my life from and idle curiosity to a near obsession at some points.

Now, I'm not an expert by any means. I only consider myself to be a well-read amateur on the subject.

For those of you have reading for awhile, my first piece of published fiction (and, unfortunately, so far the only, but more on that at a later date) was a story called Beneath the Sea of Stars, that ran in the conbooks for Furry Weekend Atlanta 2004 and Rocket City Furmeet 2006. It was set aboard a sub-light starship. While mostly a little slice-of-life romantic story, I added in a few touches of reasonably accurate science (a sub-light starship featuring rotating compartments and a weightless center section, a reasonably close star system, gravity boosting, etc).

When the first trailer for Avatar came out about six months or so ago, the first thing I noticed that made me say "holy shitballs, I have to see this movie," was this shot of the spacecraft seen at the very beginning of the movie. My thought process at the time was: holy carp, a movie about space travel with a reasonably accurate picture of what an interstellar spacecraft would probably look like based on our current understanding. Umpossible! So I was reading a little bit about the ship today over at Pandorapedia. Once again, I was blown away by how much work Cameron and his team put into getting everything right in their universe, including the science on interstellar travel. Just read the article about a spacecraft that was featured on the screen for about 30 seconds.

Anyways. Enough fanboi. Back to interstellar travel.

In reading the article, a lot of the science and engineering work on it is pretty clearly visible. Acceleration, relativistic time dilation, methods of propulsion are accounted for in the article and all, really, are nothing that hasn't been talked about in most of the books and papers I've read on the subject. It keeps within the realm of current thought. So I kept reading.

Further down in the article where crew is discussed, I came across this:
Unfortunately, the cost of shipping back personnel precludes returning individuals still under contract who have medical problems that cannot be treated on Pandora, so they are euthanized there.

But then I paused. And at one moment, I realized that, in all my thinking about this subject from an engineering and scientific standpoint, I realized I had never considered the ethical, moral, and humanistic aspects of the subject. Even now, considering that this type of research is confined to the bleeding edge of space travel science (and these guys are thinking about it in their spare time), it wouldn't surprise me to know that, probably, not many ethicists, or psychologists, have been brought in to consult on the subject of interstellar travel.

In many ways, people on manned expeditions to another star would be more alone than any human in history. I mean, hell, even the journey of the Mayflower was about 10 weeks from England to the New World. Under the absolute best of conditions, we're talking years before a person on an interstellar expedition would see home again ... if ever.

So here you are, on a remote planet orbiting a star 11.9 light years from Earth. Even at .5c, it's about 22 years home. You are a pioneer, on the frontier just like the pioneers in wagons of old. There may be only a couple dozen people on the expedition. In a situation like that, if you are injured or become ill beyond whatever field medicine would be available, would euthanasia be acceptable?

It sure would make a fascinating paper.
kiranlightpaw: kiran_likeshine (Default)
Went and saw Sherlock Holmes today with Sarah, my Dad and my Stepmom.

Read on for thoughts... )

So, in conclusion, it was a pretty good film, and I enjoyed it despite how I felt about it. Still, Avatar it still my number one for 2009.
kiranlightpaw: (avatar)
I would say this will probably be my last entry on Avatar, but I'd also probably be a lying sack of shit, too. So please excuse my while I fanboi out a little bit.

[ profile] brodycatsmouth, Sarah and I went to see it (again) yesterday afternoon. It was even better the second time around. A lot of that was due to better seating. The first time around we were down on the in the very front section of the theatre, about 10 yards off the screen, and way off to one side. It was literally impossible to get the whole screen in frame at that location and the 3D effects were a little off. At that location, after a 2:40 movie, you're neck also hurts like hell. But this time around we were in the loft , right off center and well back enough to take the whole screen in.

It makes a difference. Several times I could have sworn ash was falling. Which again makes be believe that, if you haven't seen this in 3D, you haven't seen it.

More thoughts to follow (reflecting on lessons learned in RTVF, and how it relates to Avatar and furry).

More thoughts on plot. )

How it relates to furry. )

I'm trying not to geek out too much, but it's been awhile since I saw a movie that I felt like glomming onto the way I did this one. I'd probably have to go back to my experiences with Star Trek and Star Wars as a kid, or Jurassic Park and Stargate in the 90s. Both of those were ruined by what came after, unfortunately.

Avatar II

Dec. 20th, 2009 06:18 pm
kiranlightpaw: (avatar)
Saw Avatar again. It was even better the second time.

More thoughts later.


Dec. 19th, 2009 03:14 pm
kiranlightpaw: (avatar)
I've been trying to come up with something to say about Avatar since last night. More than anything, the fact that, almost 24 hours later I'm still giddy about how good it was says a lot.

I didn't think there would be a movie, for me, that would top Star Trek this year. I was wrong. Avatar beat it by 50 light years.

It was the first movie since The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King that, after it was over, I immediately went across the lobby and tried to get into the next showing (which, unfortunately, was sold out for the rest of the freaking night). It's also the first movie since Return of the King that I've been to that got an ovation in the theatre.

Cut for potential spoilers )

It's also the first movie I've seen in 3D that didn't feel like ... a gimmick, if that makes sense. All the other 3D movies I've ever seen have treated 3D like an afterthought rather than an integral part of the movie. In watching the trailer, I was a little worried that the film would be a bomb based solely on that fact. But this comment on Techcrunch describes it best:
"After seeing the movie in 3D last night I now look at the 1080p trailer as Cameron's attempt to describe a Hawaiian sunset to a blind man. It’s not even close."
Even the Twitter reviews seem overwhelmingly positive. So yeah. Go see it. In 3D if you can, but even in 2D it will be beautiful.
kiranlightpaw: kiran_likeshine (Default)
Last night, [ profile] brodycatsmouth, [ profile] hawthornegem, [ profile] kyoht, [ profile] gre7g, Brenna and I went to "The Princess and the Frog" last night at the Monaco. I'm always a little bit leery going into a Disney movie, mostly because I wonder which Disney it's going to be. Is it going to be Lion King Disney, or is it going to be Home on the Range Disney?

It was a great movie! In fact, as I was reflecting to Brody in the car ride home, it felt like the "old Disney," that gave us Beauty and the Beast, the Little Mermaid, and the Lion King. Disney's bread and butter has always been fairy tales, and this one is no different. The animation was also the same stunning beauty and quality as the older ones, as well. There's something about the hand-drawn beauty of traditional 2D cell animation that all the advanced computers at Pixar just can't seem to duplicate.

The music was also great. A nice combination of Jazz, Zydeco and Gospel.

So go check it out, especially if you like Disney "fairytale endings."


kiranlightpaw: kiran_likeshine (Default)
Kiran Lightpaw

December 2013

89101112 1314


RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags